Quality Scenarios Example
Performance Quality Scenarios
Quality Goal |
Performance |
Scenario ID |
PERF-001 |
Scenario Name |
Peak Load Response Time |
Source |
End customer using web browser |
Stimulus |
User clicks "Add to Cart" button |
Environment |
Peak shopping period (Black Friday) with 50,000 concurrent users |
Artifact |
E-commerce web application |
Response |
System processes the request and updates cart |
Response Measure |
Response time < 2 seconds for 95% of requests |
Priority |
High |
Test Approach |
Load testing with JMeter simulating 50,000 concurrent users |
Quality Goal |
Performance |
Scenario ID |
PERF-002 |
Scenario Name |
Database Query Performance |
Source |
Product search service |
Stimulus |
Complex product search query with multiple filters |
Environment |
Normal operating conditions with 10,000 concurrent users |
Artifact |
Product catalog database and search service |
Response |
Return filtered product results |
Response Measure |
Query execution time < 500ms for 99% of searches |
Priority |
High |
Test Approach |
Database performance testing with real product data (1M+ products) |
Scalability Quality Scenarios
Quality Goal |
Scalability |
Scenario ID |
SCALE-001 |
Scenario Name |
Automatic Horizontal Scaling |
Source |
Kubernetes monitoring system |
Stimulus |
CPU utilization exceeds 80% for 5 minutes |
Environment |
Production environment during traffic spike |
Artifact |
Microservices running in Kubernetes cluster |
Response |
System automatically scales up pod replicas |
Response Measure |
New pods deployed within 2 minutes, CPU utilization returns to <70% |
Priority |
Medium |
Test Approach |
Chaos engineering and automated scaling tests |
Security Quality Scenarios
Quality Goal |
Security |
Scenario ID |
SEC-001 |
Scenario Name |
SQL Injection Attack Prevention |
Source |
Malicious user/automated attack tool |
Stimulus |
Attempts SQL injection through product search form |
Environment |
Production system exposed to internet |
Artifact |
Web application input validation and database access layer |
Response |
System blocks malicious input and logs security event |
Response Measure |
100% of injection attempts blocked, alert sent to security team within 30 seconds |
Priority |
Critical |
Test Approach |
Penetration testing with OWASP testing methodology |
Quality Goal |
Security |
Scenario ID |
SEC-002 |
Scenario Name |
Personal Data Access Control |
Source |
Customer service representative |
Stimulus |
Attempts to access customer personal data |
Environment |
Normal business operations |
Artifact |
User management system and access control layer |
Response |
System verifies authorization and grants/denies access |
Response Measure |
Only authorized roles can access PII, all access attempts logged for audit |
Priority |
Critical |
Test Approach |
Role-based access testing and audit log verification |
Availability Quality Scenarios
Quality Goal |
Availability |
Scenario ID |
AVAIL-001 |
Scenario Name |
Database Failover Recovery |
Source |
Hardware failure |
Stimulus |
Primary database server becomes unavailable |
Environment |
Production system during normal business hours |
Artifact |
Database cluster with primary/replica configuration |
Response |
System automatically fails over to replica database |
Response Measure |
Service restored within 60 seconds, < 5 minutes total downtime |
Priority |
High |
Test Approach |
Disaster recovery testing with scheduled failover exercises |
Usability Quality Scenarios
Quality Goal |
Usability |
Scenario ID |
USAB-001 |
Scenario Name |
Mobile Checkout Process |
Source |
New customer using mobile device |
Stimulus |
Attempts to complete purchase using smartphone |
Environment |
Mobile web browser on 4G network |
Artifact |
Mobile-optimized checkout interface |
Response |
Customer successfully completes purchase |
Response Measure |
90% of users complete checkout in <3 minutes without assistance |
Priority |
Medium |
Test Approach |
User experience testing with target demographic on various devices |
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.